🔗 Share this article

The Australian decisive action to prohibit social platforms access for those under 16 is sparking debate around the globe. Officials, campaigners, and guardians are monitoring intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Momentum

In Europe, a increasing chorus of states are exploring parallel bans.

• The Danish government has announced a prohibition on social media for youth below 15, with the leader declaring that mobile devices and networks are "robbing our youngsters' youth". The policy is expected to be formalized in the coming year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield children from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is introducing a online verification tool to verify the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has urged lawmakers to enact a law raising the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In The French government, the leader has threatened a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has suggested a related action, alongside an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The government in the Netherlands has recommended parents to prevent their children from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the European parliament has approved a non-binding motion calling for a ban for under-16s without guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "habit-forming" nature of these platforms, the step does not establish enforceable legislation.

"A strong age restriction is a good starting point," commented a leading MEP behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Approach

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong data".

Previously, support gathered behind a proposal to enact restrictions on social media use by minors, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have raised warnings. A prominent charity established by the loved ones of a young person who died after viewing disturbing social media material suggests that a simple age ban may not improve online safety and could result in a "sudden drop-off" of harm when young people reach the legal age.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to design platforms and apps that are safe and age appropriate for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

America: A State-by-State Landscape

Across America, action is largely unfolding at the state level amid federal stalemate.

• Utah mandates adult approval for under-18s to use social media and controls late-night use.
• Florida has enacted a law banning under-14s from joining social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• Virginia has enacted a law restricting under-16s to one hour of social media time per day, with any further time dependent on a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly enacted measures demanding adult authorization for minors to open social media profiles.

Even with bipartisan support and calls from certain individuals to follow Australia's path, a federal ban is presently seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Outside of these regions, other nations are also exploring options.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, world agencies strike a more measured tone. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans have downsides and "might backfire". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable children and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to improve safety.

While this international debate continues, the steps of this nation and several other countries indicate that governments around the world are no longer prepared to stand by for tech companies to make changes on their own.